• Frank Graves posted an update 4 years, 10 months ago

    I recall several occasions when I really looked for a analysis write-up after studying the editorial prepared by members 726169-73-9of the editorial board or one particular of the reviewers in the same journal issue, and from time to time utilised and cited it in my possess research. So to have the self-advertising articles pays even in the moral way. Due to comparable motives, many journals encourage to post functions this sort of as highlights, graphical abstracts, stand-by yourself statements relating to scientific significance, audioslides, and so on., or spotlight selected papers on their internet web page . It is practically unattainable to observe the actual reasons top to each distinct obtain or quotation of the respective paper. Even so, it is achievable to observe self-cites, which depict too apparent strategy employed to attract consideration to the journal. When analyzing two top-tier biomedical journals, we have demonstrated right here that truly hanging 98.nine% of the variability in yearly quotation counts can be described by journal self-cites and cites by other journals of the very same publisher, and that notably cites obtained for the duration of post-publication year are affected by this issue.While the skewed sample of cites by self-cites in leading-tier biomedical journals affects only marginally their impact element, and must probably be treated far more as a form of advertisement rather of unethical behavior , in other journals, there takes place also citation stacking. The possibility to set up citation stacking was pointed out for a very first time possibly by G. Franck in 1999, who proposed that groups of editors or journals could perform jointly for mutual positive aspects, although there was no documentation for these kinds of conduct at that time. The very first broadly medialized scenario of citation stacking appeared in 2012, when Thomson Reuters described an exclusion of fifty one journals from JCR. Whereas forty eight of them ended up blacklisted due to excessive variety of journal self-cites , three journals have been banned owing to citation stacking. These three journals Cell Transplantation, Healthcare Science Monitor and The Scientific Globe Journal were alleged to function seemingly with each other to cite every single other and thus elevate their influence variables. This situation included a publication of a single paper in Healthcare Science Keep track of citing 445 papers revealed in Mobile Transplantation within the influence aspect calculation window, and yet another forty four papers released in Healthcare Science Keep track of within the impact element calculation window . A single of the 4 authors of the paper was a founding editor of Cell Transplantation, two others were its associate editors. Other similar papers appeared in all the a few journals, citing every single other in hundreds of citations. Also a fourth journal, Technology and Innovation, benefited from few dozens of citations in a related way. These kinds of praxis may be more widespread than we in fact believe about. Journal self-quotation networks can be shaped even by a solitary person, as pinpointed just lately by John P. A. Ioannidis. He observed that the 14th most prolific author in the subject of biomedicine in many years 2008-2012 according to his h index calculated by Microsoft Academic Search, the Academy-of-Athens-dependent Dimitrios H.